• Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or My Tools.

Is Efficiency Overrated?

Minimal Social Interactions Lead to Belonging and Positive Affect

  1. Gillian M. Sandstrom1
  2. Elizabeth W. Dunn1
  1. 1Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
  1. Gillian M. Sandstrom, Department of Psychology (Downing Site), University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, England CB2 3EB. Email: gs488{at}cam.ac.uk

Abstract

When we buy our daily cup of coffee, sometimes we engage in a social interaction with the barista, and sometimes we are in a rush. Every day we have opportunities to transform potentially impersonal, instrumental exchanges into genuine social interactions, and the happiness literature suggests that we may reap benefits by doing so; in other words, treating a service provider like we would an acquaintance (i.e., weak tie) might make us happier. In the current study, people who had a social interaction with a barista (i.e., smiled, made eye contact, and had a brief conversation) experienced more positive affect than people who were as efficient as possible. Further, we found initial evidence that these effects were mediated by feelings of belonging. These results suggest that, although people are often reluctant to have a genuine social interaction with a stranger, they are happier when they treat a stranger like a weak tie.

Article Notes

  • Declaration of Conflicting Interests The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

  • Funding The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This work was supported by a Doctoral Fellowship from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [grant number 752-2011-2192], awarded to the first author and a Standard Research Grant from the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council [grant number 410-2011-0582] awarded to the second author.

This Article

  1. Social Psychological and Personality Science 1948550613502990
    All Versions of this Article:
    1. Version of Record - Apr 9, 2014
    2. current version image indicatorOnlineFirst Version of Record - Sep 12, 2013
    What's this?

Share